Sun Shiwen

Keywords： Planning Paradigm, Construction-oriented Planning, Development-oriented Planning, Regulation-oriented Planning, Evolution of Urban Planning, China

Abstract：

This paper reviews the major “paradigms” for urban planning around the world and classifies the planning in China into three paradigms: construction-oriented planning, development-oriented planning, and regulation-oriented planning. The contemporary urban planning system in China started with construction-oriented planning in the 1950s under the influence of the Soviet model, and this course was changed after China broke up with Russia. In the early stage of reform and opening up, urban planning system was reshaped with reference to development-oriented planning and was later mixed with regulation-oriented planning at the end of 1980s. Although the key features, contents, and methods in those three paradigms were all absorbed and played an important role in the rapid urbanisation of China, urban planning system is still constructionoriented at its core, notwithstanding the attempts and pilot programmes of urban spatial development strategic plan, territorial planning of cities and counties, and the integration of multi-modal planning. Based on the analysis on the evolution course of urban planning system in China and its functions under given political and socio-economic landscape, this paper reveals the institutions of urban planning in China in different times, its unique development path, as well as the root causes.

Funds：

Dr. Sun Shiwen is a professor and PhD advisor in the College of Architecture and Urban Planning at Tongji University.

• [1] 托马斯·库恩. 科学革命的结构[M]. 金吾伦, 胡新和, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2004.

  [2] WARD S V. Planning the twentieth-century city: the advanced capitalist world[M]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2002.

  [3] HALL P. Urban and regional planning[M]. 3rd ed. New York and London: Routledge, 1992.

  [4] CULLINGWORTH B, CAVES R W. Planning in the USA: policies, issues, and processes[M]. 4th ed. New York and London: Routledge, 2014.

  [5] MANDELKER D R, ROGER A. Cunningham, planning and control of land development[M]. 3rd ed. Charlottesville: The Michie Company, 1990.

  [6] HEIN C, ed. The Routledge handbook of planning history[M]. New York and London: Routledge, 2018.

  [7] BOOTH P, BREUILLARD M, FRASER C, et al, eds. Spatial planning systems of Britain and France: a comparative analysis[M]. New York and London: Routledge, 2007.

  [8] 中国城市规划学会. 中国城乡规划学学科史[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2018.

  [9] 孙施文. 中国城乡规划学科发展的历史与展望[J]. 城市规划, 2016(12): 103-112.

  [10] 上海市城市规划设计研究院. 大上海都市计划[M]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2014.

  [11] 李浩. 八大重点城市规划: 新中国成立初期的城市规划历史研究[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2016.

  [12] 李浩. 城·事·人: 城市规划前辈访谈录（1~5 辑）[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.

  [13] 侯丽. 对计划经济体制下的中国城镇化的历史新解读[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2010(2): 70-78.

  [14] 中国建筑工业出版社城市建设编辑室. 城市规划译文集1[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1980.

  [15] 北京市城市规划管理局科技处情报组. 城市规划译文集2[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1983.

  [16] 邹德慈. 新中国城市规划发展史研究[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.

  [17] 孙施文. 解析中国城市规划[J]. 城乡规划, 2017(1): 12-21.

  [18] 孙施文. 解析中国城市规划：规划院制度与中国城市规划发展探究[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2018(4): 10-15.

  [19] 陈锋, 王唯山, 吴唯佳, 等. 非法定规划的现状与走势[J]. 城市规划, 2005(11): 45-53.

  [20] TEWDWR-JONES M. Spatial planning and governance: understanding UK planning[M]. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2012.

  [21] 彭坤焘, 赵民. 新时期规划编制类型的多样化态势及成因——暨“工具理性”及“理性批判”的讨论[J]. 城市规划, 2012(9): 9-22.

  [22] 赵民, 郝晋伟. 城市总体规划实践中的悖论及对策探讨[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2012(3): 1-9.

  [23] 张京祥, 罗震东. 中国当代城乡规划思潮[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2013.

  [24] 潘维. 中国模式——解读人民共和国的60 年[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2009.

  [25] NASR J, VOLAIT M, eds. Urbanism: imported or exported?[M]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2003.

  [26] 孙施文. 现行政府管理体制对城市规划作用的影响[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2007(5): 32-39.

  [27] 李昕. 中国城市规划制度化历史发展的内在逻辑——关于中国城市规划制度发展史的思考[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2005(2): 81-85.

  [28] 张庭伟. 中国规划走向世界——从物质建设规划到社会发展规划[J]. 城市规划学刊, 1997(1): 5-9.