卡尔·克罗普夫

Karl KROPF

在城市形态学领域，“地块和产权地块”概念缺乏清晰的定义和解释。这个问题很大程度上是因为它们被用来指代多种对象。此外，产权概念的非单一性以及不同概念下的边界不一致，都进一步加剧了概念模糊性。随之而来的问题就是，城市形态的不同方面常被误解为一个单一且定义不清的实体。尽管地块在建筑类型学和城市形态学中具有重要作用，但其概念的模糊引发了疑问，我们不清楚地块在城市形态生成和演变过程中，尤其是在街道格局、地块格局和建筑格局三者之间的延续或不同程度变化的核心过程中所起到的作用。因此，本文旨在厘清地块和产权地块的概念，解析界定以上概念的相关特征及其潜在关联和逻辑。笔者认为，地块被定义为一种产权的根本基础源于人的行为、人与环境的互动，以及人际间的互动。这一观点为更深入地探讨地块格局延续现象提供了坚实的理论基础。

There is a lack of clarity in urban morphology in the use of the terms ‘plot’ and ‘lot’. The complications arise in large part because these terms are used to refer to several things. Further ambiguities arise because the concept of property is not univocal, and the boundaries corresponding to the different meanings of plot do not necessarily coincide. An attendant problem is that distinct aspects of urban form are conflated into a single, illdefined entity. Given the significance of the plot in building typology and urban morphology, the ambiguities in its definition raise questions about the role of the plot in the generation and transformation of urban form and in particular in the central phenomenon of persistence and the differential rates of change between street pattern, plot pattern and building pattern. The aim of this paper is therefore to clarify the terms plot and lot by examining the pertinent characteristics that are used to define them and the underlying relationships and logic they entail. The resolution offered in conclusion is that the fundamental basis for defining a plot as property is rooted in human behaviour and our interactions with both our environment and each other. This may then provide a fruitful basis for investigating the phenomenon of persistence in more detail.

 卡尔·克罗普夫，英国牛津布鲁克斯大学建筑环境学院，《城市形态》（Urban Morphology）期刊副主编。kkropf@brookes.ac.uk

刘鹏，重庆大学建筑城规学院，自然资源部国土空间规划监测评估预警重点实验室，副教授。pengliucd@hotmail.com

吴楠，重庆大学建筑城规学院，硕士研究生。woola825@163.com

• 收起