杨宇振

YANG Yuzhen

笔者首先讨论和分析列斐伏尔理论在实践中的困境，探讨产生列斐伏尔空间生产理论的特定社会情景和空间问题，进而论述1960年代前后列斐伏尔日常生活批判理论的空间转向，特别是与情境主义国际成员康斯坦特的“总体都市主义”理论的关联，在他与情境主义国际成员之间的相互作用中深化了日常生活批判的空间转向和理论建构。其次，笔者进一步探讨从理论到空间实践的路径，即从列斐伏尔、康斯坦特到凡·艾克的理论发展过程中被忽视的线索，这一线索为今天的空间实践提供了重要的指导意义和价值。再次，笔者将列斐伏尔的社会空间理论结合具体实践和人物展开讨论，将其放置于与城市规划和建筑学更相关的语境中分析其过程和问题。最后笔者提出，对于总体性的追求以及对于人自身实现的追求，始终是空间实践的根本目标。

This paper firstly discusses and analyzes the dilemma of Henri Lefebvre's theory in practice, discusses the specific social situations and spatial problems that produced Lefebvre’s theory of space production, and then discusses the spatial turn of Lefebvre’s critical theory of everyday life around the 1960s, especially his relationship with the theory of “unityurbanism” of Constant, a member of the Situationist International. Lefebvre deepened the spatial turn and theoretical construction of the critique of everyday life in his interactions with members of the Situationist International. This paper further explores a path from theory to space practice, that is, the neglected clue from Lefebvre, Constance Nieuwenhuys to Aldo Van Eyck, which provides important guidance and value for space practice today. This paper combines Lefebvre’s theory of social space with specific practices and characters to discuss its process and problems in a context more related to urban planning and architecture. It finally points out that pursuit of totality and human self-realization is always the fundamental goal of space practice.

杨宇振，重庆大学建筑城规学院，教授。yuzhenyang@cqu.edu.cn

• 收起